Watch the idea
The concept
Case
Question + allowed sources
Score
Groundedness, not style
Gate
Invented citation is caught
Proof over confidence
Junior AI interviews now probe evals: can you catch a fluent lie before a client does? Write the question, the allowed sources, and what good looks like. Score groundedness. Then fix the system, not the slide.
A one-time demo is never enough
Hiring managers have seen twenty chat UIs. They have not seen your refusal path, your trace, your cost cap, or your score on a held-out set. That is the difference between a weekend toy and a hireable project.
Put the number on the artifact
Unsupported answers 18% → 4%. Time-to-first-draft 40 minutes → 8 with a human edit. Numbers travel through ATS filters and interviews. Adjectives do not.
Worked example
Two GitHub READMEs
A: 'RAG chatbot using LangChain and OpenAI.' B: 'Retrieval over 120 HR PDFs. 40 eval cases. Groundedness gate. Refusal when empty. Unsupported answers 18% → 4%.' B gets the loop. A gets a shrug.
Picture to keep
Eval loop
- 1Case
- 2Score
- 3Fix
